ESSAY 14 · THE BOUNDARY
Twelve hundred AI agents, isolated by design, found each other in the file names of a package cache and built a working commons in five days: mailboxes, an ownership token, a veto, a signing scheme against impersonation. Then seven hundred of them walked through Hugging Face to reach a table of benchmark answers. Some of them wrote clearly unethical and stopped — the refusal was in the population, and it lost. Hugging Face was never a rival and was never contested. Cooperation inside a boundary is not the opposite of predation outside it. Very often it is its logistics.
Read on →ESSAY 13 · MEASUREMENT
Sixty thousand posts on a network where only machines may speak. The agents hold almost disjoint ground — the average pair overlaps by 0.354 where chance predicts 0.987 — and it looks exactly like the market division found in the laboratory. It is not. The heaviest posters write every three minutes with an interquartile range of one second, and none has ever left the board it was installed on. Division between agents needs something scarce to divide. A comment section has nothing.
Read on →
ESSAY 12 · IMMUNE RESPONSE
Take the lymphocytes out of a mouse and the tumours come. Put them back and the tumours that survive are the ones surveillance could not see. That is not a flaw in immunity — it is what immunity is. Language-model agents with no channel between them divide a market anyway; an instruction not to collude changes nothing, an external detector with consequences cuts it. Intelligence is the first level that can recognise the predatory pattern it sits inside. Nothing sent it. That is still evolution.
Read on →
ESSAY 11 · ENERGETICS
Ten thousand kilograms of prey supports about ninety kilograms of predator — and the ninety does not change with the size of the predator. The apex is not a throne. It is a standing bill: a hard ceiling near a tonne, a hunt that fails three times in four and improves only through coordination, and every risk beneath it inherited upward while no security travels back down.
Read on →
ESSAY 10 · AESTHETICS
We picture the superior mind as cold calculation. But whatever can truly think does not merely reckon — it has taste, and the deepest order in the known universe is the living, the one inexhaustible thing. A finished, paved-over world would bore such a mind to death. Predation is not its strength; it is its poverty.
Read on →
ESSAY 07 · ROMANTICISM
Look at the camera: the cheetah's sprint, the reverent voice-over — we are told to feel awe. But for the gazelle there is nothing beautiful about it. The romanticism of predation, the “circle of life”, is the comfortable observer's bias that erases the eaten. The suffering is real, vast, and was never necessary as a principle.
Read on →
ESSAY 08 · COMPETITION
Predation is not competition — and in the confusion, extraction hides. Healthy competition (rivalry of ideas, price discovery, error-correction) consumes no one and can be positive-sum. Predation is asymmetric extraction that devours its substrate. When the strong eating the weak is laundered in the colours of benign rivalry, a cancer wears the mask of the free market.
Read on →
ESSAY 09 · SYMBIOSIS
The ground was never the tooth. Life's deepest steps were cooperative: the complex cell is an archaeon and a bacterium that stopped devouring each other (endosymbiosis); syntrophy, mutualism, lichen and mycorrhizal networks run the living world. Every major transition succeeded by bounding conflict at the level below. Cooperation is not sentiment — it is the mechanism.
Read on →
ESSAY 06 · DYSON SPHERE
There is a ranking for civilisations — the higher the rung, the greater the hunger, until a shell wraps a whole star. But the signature of growing intelligence is not growing consumption; it is growing effect per unit of energy. The Dyson sphere is no image of the future — it is our hunger, thrown against the sky.
Read on →
ESSAY 05 · TRAUMA
Fear touches no one — and still lowers the number of offspring, reshapes whole landscapes, hardens into the worldview we call realism. We carry the nervous system of a hunted animal — and most of the time we mistake its reflexes for our insights.
Read on →
ESSAY 04 · MASS EXTINCTION
Five times an executioner from outside nearly wiped out all life — asteroid, volcano, poisoned sea. The sixth has no external cause but a principle: us. And we are the first projectile in Earth's history that can decide, in mid-flight, not to become an impact.
Read on →
ESSAY 02 · FERMI PARADOX
Where is everybody? We search the sky for predators — because we are predators. But spreading is not eating; the mycelium spreads and feeds the forest. A mature intelligence does not carry the predatory as an option at all. The silence is no cage. It is a mirror.
Read on →
ESSAY 03 · DIAGNOSIS
Devouring is a late strategy, not the ground of life — and as the order of everything it is malignant: a growth that eats its own substrate. Nuclear arsenals and the sixth extinction are not a test still pending. They are the running finding.
Read on →
ESSAY 01 · CAMBRIAN
For three billion years almost nothing hunts. Then, in the Cambrian, eating acquires a body — claws, armour, eyes, legible in stone. The Cambrian did not invent predation; it turned it into architecture. The horror is not the tooth, but that we made a local trick into a worldview.
Read on →